Hills is making multi millions and more on this stuff and it has: insufficent meat content, low quality grains, fat of unidentifiable nature, other controversial fillers and some other pretty disgusting stuff. How can they get away with it as a top veterinary dog food?????
Ha! Just read something else where it said "Science Diet receives a 1 star rating simply because there is nothing lower" !!!!!!!

Technorati Tags: Dog Food, fillers, google, low quality, meat content, quality grains, science diet, script type, star rating, text javascript

Is it the pretty TV commercials? The pretty bag?
What the front of the bag says doesn’t match what the back of the bag (the ingredients) says. Beneful has a lot of fillers, byproducts, and artificial dyes. And also has very low meat content.
Here is an analysis of the ingredients in Beneful: http://www.dogfoodanalysis.com/dog_food_reviews/showproduct.php?product=69&cat=all
And here is a website that shows how to interpret the ingredients: http://www.dogfoodproject.com/

Technorati Tags: amp, artificial dyes, byproducts, Dog Food, food reviews, google, meat content, script type, text javascript, tv commercials